Thursday, November 22, 2012

Linux Mint 14 Nadia Review: Is it better than Maya?

Big news this week in the Linux world - the reigning king of Linux "Linux Mint" has come out with the Mate and Cinnamon desktop version of Ubuntu 12.10. The codename is Nadia. Now, before jumping onto the actual review, a bit of introspection. One question that always comes to my mind - I have reviewed so many wonderful Linux distros and quite a few are really really outstanding. Still what works for Linux Mint release after release? Why people in the Linux world uses it more than any other Linux distro, even Fedora and Ubuntu? Why I too use Linux Mint as my primary distro (except one machine, P4 old computer, where I use Puppy Precise)?
 Linux Mint 14 Cinnamon
From Linux Mint 14
From Linux Mint 14

Linux Mint 14 Mate
From Linux Mint 14
From Linux Mint 14
Is it because it is easier for a Windows user to adapt to Linux Mint? I doubt, because my Linux Mint desktops look nowhere close to Windows! Is it because everything works out of the box and even if you aren't able to run a single code in terminal or fix a single thing in Linux, Mint still works? Possibly yes! I haven't seen a distro in my life which is so trouble free and stable (this includes Windows as well which in my opinion is trouble only!).

With this background, now lets directly jump onto the review. It has three purposes - one, to assess the new release in general. Two, compare it to the previous release (Mint Maya 13, which is also an LTS with 5 years of support). And finally, compare it to the recently released Snowlinux 3 Mate / Cinnamon which deeply impressed me.

Assessment of Mint Nadia
I had already downloaded the RC2 versions of both Cinnamon and Mate. The release note came sometime in 11 Nov with the final release on 20 Nov. So, without rushing for the new release I just installed them one by one and updated post installation. For both I had to download about 200 MB of updates and my installations were the final releases. Both are 32-bit ISOs about less than 1 GB in size.

Installations were done in a Asus K54C, 2.4 Ghz Core i3 processor with 2 GB RAM. The same laptop was used for testing out the Mint Maya as well. Both have Linux kernel 3.5 and Cinnamon has 1.6 (the latest) with Mate having 1.4 (also the latest) desktop.

What is new?
Lets begin with the Mate version. The information provided here are from the release notes combined with snapshots from my testing. Mate 1.4 supports bluetooth now as well as Caja supports dropbox. MATE now includes its own character map, fast alt-tabbing with Marco compositing, a selection of notification styles (although this was included in Linux Mint 13, it wasn't part of MATE 1.2), and Caja improvements such as a toggle button to show and edit the path and a new button to compare files in the file conflict dialog.
From Linux Mint 14
From Linux Mint 14

Cinnamon 1.6, on the other hand, comes with a lot of features and attractiveness. Cinnamon, I guess, is developing at a faster rate than Mate. The major new additions for Cinnamon 1.6 include:

1. Give names to workspaces: like naming different workspaces for movies, document work, internet browsing, etc. These will remain even after you relogin. I am not sure it will be any utility to me at this point but might be handy if I am working with 10-15 workspaces to recall where I was doing what! Additionally, once you switch workspaces, the names will be visible in bold.

From Linux Mint 14
2. Windows Quick list: Alongside workspaces, there is a windows quick list applet as well on the right hand corner of the panel, for easy access and to keep track of the applications that the user has opened.

3. Similar to Mate 1.4, there is a notification applet as well in Cinnamon 1.6.

From Linux Mint 14
Cinnamon 1.6 has 800 incremental innovations including Nemo. You can check out all of them at the Linux Mint notes.

Additional improvement I saw is in the artwork. Linux Mint 14 has some really nice looking new wallpapers.
  
From Linux Mint 14

Applications
Application list is more or less the same as in previous version - only difference being the latest release has the most updated applications. A summary of the applications present is given below for the benefit of the new users who want to try out Linux Mint.
  • Internet: Firefox 16, Thunderbird 16, Pidgin Internet Messenger, Transmission bit-torrent client, XChat IRC
  • Graphics: GIMP 2.8, document viewer 1.4.0, Eye of Mate viewer, Gthumb 3.0.2 image viewer, simple scan
  • Multimedia: Banshree music player, Brasero CD/DVD writer, Gnome MPlayer, Movie Player, VLC 2.0.4
  • Office: LibreOffice 3.6.2.2 writer, calc, impress, base, draw - basically Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access and Paint equivalent
Apart from these, Linux Mint is feature rich with Archive manager, Pluma (gedit fork), gdebi package manager to install applications in Debian package format. Caja 1.4.0 is the file manager in Mate and Nemo 1.1.2 in Cinnamon, both are forked from Nautilus. 

The base repository is the same as Ubuntu 12.10 and it is perhaps the richest Linux repository around. The GUI is a bit different from Ubuntu - MinInstall 7.4.4. It is simple and works well to search and install applications from the respository.

Comparison with Linux Mint Maya

Parameters Mint 14 Cinnamon Mint 13 Cinnamon Mint 14 Mate Mint 13 Mate
Size of ISO 922 MB 857 MB 1 GB 942 MB
Booting time (post installation) 20 sec 15 sec 10 sec 10 sec
Desktop Cinnamon 1.6.7 Cinnamon 1.4 Mate 1.4 Mate 1.2
Linux kernel 3.5.0-17 3.2.0-23 3.5.0-17 3.2.0-23
CPU Usage (post installation) 1-5% 1-5% 2-3% 2-3%
RAM usage (post installation) 221 MB 200 MB 199 MB 207 MB
Installation time (with 1 MBPS connection) 30 Min 30 Min 30 Min 30 Min
Wifi detection Immediate Immediate Immediate Immediate
Touchpad detection Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic
Ease of use Really smooth to use Really smooth to use Really smooth to use Really smooth to use
Eye candy factor Looks the best with a very elegant file manager and with application colors matching the ash-black colored theme Looks good with application colors matching the ash colored theme Looks good with application colors matching the ash colored theme Looks good with application colors matching the ash colored theme
Repository MintInstall 7.4.4 MintInstall 7.3.9 MintInstall 7.4.4 MintInstall 7.3.9
File Manager Nemo 1.1.2 Nautilus 3.4.1 Caja 1.4.0 Caja 1.2.1

Linux Mint generally boots up a tad bit slower than Ubuntu distros. Based on performance in terms of resource usage, clearly the Nadia Mate 1.4 is marginally ahead. I noted really good performance from Mate 1.4, almost comparable to an XFCE desktop! At steady state with only system monitor running, the RAM consumption was around 200 MB and 2-3% CPU usage. If you talk of multi-tasking, with Firefox 16 playing youtube, Writer and Calc running, it consumes only 357 MB RAM with only 40% CPU usage. Mint Maya Mate 1.2, too, gives almost comparable performance on the same machine. It is difficult to choose between the two and given Mint Maya Mate has 5 years of support, I guess it would be better to stick to Linux Mint 13 and wait for another LTS to come in 2014.

From Linux Mint 14

However, for Linux Mint Cinnamon, the CPU usage shows a bit higher, it might be because of some driver problem that I need to rectify on my system. Else, Linux Mint 14 Cinnamon looks shinier and more attractive. Special mention should be made of Nemo 1.1.2, it looks very refined in Nadia, I must say. Overall, even Cinnamon is quite speedy on my system and I could multi-task easily under similar conditions as above by spending only 470 MB RAM and 70-75% CPU usage. Nautilus in the Mint Maya Cinnamon looks quite blander compared to Nemo in Mint Nadia. But, Mint Maya has 5 years of support behind it.

From Linux Mint 14

Comparison with Snowlinux 3 Cinnamon/Mate
I reviewed Snowlinux 3 release a week ago and it also came out with Cinnamon 1.6 and Mate 1.4 versions, as well as almost identical look to Linux Mint. Even there I got a bit of higher CPU usage in Cinnamon but very good performance in Mate. Performance wise, I would rate the Snowlinux 3 series at par with Linux Mint 14. Actually, it is a tough choice as both of them look, feel and behave identically. However, number of out-of-the-box applications are more in Linux Mint and it has a better online forum.

From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon

Overall 
Linux Mint 14 is indeed a very good release. I found Ubuntu 12.10 to be a bit unstable and but Mint 14 is really stable. I have been using it from the RC days and it has worked smoothly for me till date. However, some of the goodies in Ubuntu 12.10 are not here like Web apps, Ubuntu music store, Amazon integration (some hate it though!), better integration with social network, etc. But, Linux Mint has rock solid stability. 

Personally, I don't get tired of installing Linux distros as it is my hobby and I install 2-3 new distros to my systems every week and uninstall the older ones. But, my main production laptop has Linux Mint Maya Cinnamon 64-bit and I don't like to tamper with my preferred settings in there. Am I going to re-install Mint Nadia to it? Possibly no - for now I'll stick to Mint Maya and add Mint Nadia ppa's and download Nemo file manager. Here's how you can backport Nadia ppa's.

25Nov2012: Actually backporting Nadia ppa's and then changing Nemo 1.1.2 to default file manager has improved performance of Linux Mint 13 significantly. Nemo is a lot lighter and faster file manager, undoubtedly. Definite recommendation from my side to backport Nadia ppa's.

To backport, open Menu ->Preferences -> Software Sources -> Click on "Backported Packages (Backports)" checkbox. Close it and then launch update manager either from menu or from the update notifier on the right hand side of the panel. Refresh and update all Level 1 and Level 2 updates. Restart and you are done!

To set Nemo as the default file manager, go to Menu -> Accessories -> Files (one would be Nautilus and another would be Nemo). Open Nemo and on right hand top corner you'll see an option to make Nemo the default file manager. Click it and you are done. 

Download
Linux Mint 14 is available in both 32 and 64-bit versionsYou can download via torrent, direct download option available as well. Please check the release note for downloading.

Read more!

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Manjaro 0.8.2 XFCE: Light, fast and works well, new Package manager aside

The flagship distro from the Manjaro stable is perhaps the XFCE version. I was deeply impressed by the refinement and functionalities offered by KDE version. The XFCE version, too, lived up to the standards set in 0.8.1 release. I tested it out on my Asus K54C, 2.4 Ghz Core i3 processor with 2 GB RAM. First I did a live boot followed by installation on an 8 GB partition specially created for Linux distro testing.

From Manjaro 0.8.2 XFCE

XFCE 4.10 is the desktop environment with Linux kernel 3.4.18 in this edition. The desktop looks really bright and has a really good looking conky! New wallpaper is also better than the previous default wallpaper. The 32-bit ISO is 1.2 GB and lower in size than the 0.8.1 release (1.5 GB). I thought the developers would have packed all the goodness of 0.8.1 release in a smaller package - however, when I booted it up I saw a trimmed version of the former release. A lot of applications like, Openshot video editor, complete LibreOffice suite, PlayonLinux, etc. are not in the updated edition. A letdown after the 0.8.1 release for sure. A list of major applications available in 0.8.2 is given below:
  • Graphics: GIMP 2.8, Viewnior, Simple Scan
  • Internet: Firefox 16.0.2, Pidgin chat client, Skype 4, Thunderbird 16, XChat, Remote Dekstop
  • Multimedia: SMPlayer, DeaDBeef, Xfburn among others
  • Office: LibreOffice Calc, LibreOffice Writer, epdf viewer, Orage calendar, etc.

You can read my review of the 0.8.1 XFCE release here. The updated 0.8.2, too, works out of the box like the former release and is pretty easy to install on the hard disc.

On package management and installation of applications, I liked the 0.8.1 release more than the present release. Earlier release had a simple pacman gui where applications are grouped into different classes on the left hand panel. You can either search or directly go to the category and browse for the package you would like to install. However, present release complicates things by giving a package browser (where you can browse packages, check dependencies, etc. but unfortunately can't install!) and a pacman-gui (where you write the package name noted from the package browser and it will open a terminal to install). This is a bit funny and unnecessarily complicated when things can be a lot simpler.

From Manjaro 0.8.2 XFCE
From Manjaro 0.8.2 XFCE
I would like the previous pacman package interface back and the new interface doesn't appeal to me at all! However, installing packages like Openshot video editor, PlayonLinux, Docky, etc. wasn't a big deal even on the new release. Only thing, I had to do back and forth a few times to install them. With a couple of panels I created a Gnome 2 look from XFCE.

From Manjaro 0.8.2 XFCE
Rest is pretty much the same. On my system after installation, the default desktop would consume about 1-5% CPU and 160-200 MB RAM, like the previous edition. The distro is smooth to use and offer good multi-tasking ability even within limited resources.

From Manjaro 0.8.2 XFCE
Overall
In overall, I would stick to the earlier release (0.8.1), which I thought as one of the best XFCE releases of the year. Given Archlinux has a rolling release, it is just a matter of updating the old version. As you can see in the screenshot below, it is just a matter of downloading around 500 MB of updates to make it the latest version. I didn't download the new package manager but rather stick to the tried and tested old one.

From Manjaro 0.8.2 XFCE
Package manager issue aside, the distro is really good and if you are looking for a rolling release slick XFCE distro, then you should try Manjaro XFCE!

Read more!

Saturday, November 17, 2012

Manjaro Linux 0.8.2 KDE Review: Is it the best KDE release this year?

Right from the first release itself, Manjaro Linux really impressed me. I tried their KDE release earlier, in 0.8 and 0.8.1 but was not as impressed as the XFCE version. But, the 0.8.2 release changed my opinion. It is one of the most refined and polished KDE releases that I have used this year.

From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
The release note of Manjaro 0.8.2 came on 10th Nov'12 in Distrowatch and the release is in three flavors: Gnome, KDE and XFCE. I guess the XFCE release is the most popular from Manjaro stable but I started of with the KDE release. Of late, KDE is catching my attention most and I must admit, I have started liking the KDE 4.9.2. Most of the earlier bugs are fixed and it works well.

From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
The 32 bit KDE version of Manjaro is about 1.6 GB in size and quite bulky in terms of Linux standards. Manjaro KDE is 4.9.2 and Linux kernel is 3.4.18. Manjaro is built on Archlinux.

I tried it out on my Asus K54C, Core i3, 2,4 Ghz and 2 GB RAM. Live boot was followed by installation on a 8 GB partition. Screen resolution was correctly identified by Manjaro, Wifi was recognized easily, sound didn't work initially but once I checked out the sound settings I could make it work by simple trial and error. However, I am not sure why the Manjaro wallpaper is not in KDE though it is present in Gnome and XFCE releases! The KDE default wallpaper looks really bland.

One thing I must say, I have used a few KDE distros like PCLinuxOS, OpenSUSE 12.2, Kubuntu, Linux Mint KDE, etc. but nowhere KDE felt so smooth to use like in Manjaro Linux. May be my perception but we'll come to know once I compare Manjaro Linux with the other notable KDE 4.9.2 release, Kubuntu 12.10.

Applications
Somehow, I have a mixed feeling on the application list. It has some really good applications but some notable apps are missing as well. A list is given below:
  • Internet:Firefox 16, Thunderbird 16
  • Graphics: GIMP 2.8, Photo Manager, Photo Viewer, screen capture, okular document viewer for pdf, cbr, etc., and scanner
  • Multimedia: Amarok music player, Dragon video player, sound mixer and multimedia CD/DVD burner
  • Office: LibreOffice 3.6 Calc and Write

From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
In addition multimedia codecs are in-built as well as Adobe Flashplugin 11 works out-of-the-box. Hence, straight away you can live boot this distro and start playing your favorite movie or music. Further, there are apps for coding and development as well as desktop globe.
From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2

From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
Coming on to the notable misses -
  1. Why no LibreOffice Impress? Professionals like me require Impress along Calc and Write. Should have been provided by default.
  2. No chat client like empathy, pidgin, Skype, etc.
  3. No torrent downloader
Anyway, no major problem therein - all of them can be downloaded from the archlinux repos. Settings are integrated like any other KDE distro which is actually helpful for the new users.

Installation
Manjaro has a very easy installation process, comparable to the likes of Ubuntu or Linux Mint. There is an installation guide as well which illustrates each and every step with suitable diagrams, though the diagrams are from 0.8.1 installation, I guess.
From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
Installations steps are as usual, choose the installation drive, format it, install, create user id and grub2 menu. All inclusive, Manjaro takes about 15-20 minutes to install which is pretty quick.

Repository
Manjaro has a package browser to search and a new pcman-gui to install packages. However, only the package browser is present in the default ISO and I guess users are supposed to download packages through terminal - or am I missing somethings here? Because unlike XFCE version, the pacman-gui is not present in the KDE version.

Anyway, I downloaded it through terminal as root (#su followed by #pacman -S pacman-gui). With Pacman-gui, I checked by installing a couple of applications (VLC and Skype), it resolves all dependencies while downloading and shows it in the tree section. Individual package browser and pacman package manager is fairly simple to operate and works well. However, I don't understand the meaning of keeping two separate applications. Can't it be as simple as Ubuntu software center? There you have only one window for both. Actually I liked the earlier pacman interface where both browsing and downloading could be done together, more than the present one.

From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
Performance
I really liked the smoothness of Manjaro 0.8.2 KDE. If I compare it with the recently released Kubuntu 12.10, RAM usage in Manjaro KDE is about 440 MB compared to 300 MB in Kubuntu, under similar conditions and on the same machine. CPU usages are identical, about 5-7%. Both are 32-bit distros.

From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
However, I found Manjaro more smooth to use than Kubuntu. In my system RAM wasn't a constraint and I could multi-task with several applications like LibreOffice Calc, Firefox, konsole, and package manager downloading applications with ease.

Overall
In overall, to me, this could have been the KDE distro of the year barring the pacman issue! KDE never felt so good to use. Things mostly work out of the box, Manjaro KDE is loaded with applications, is stable, has a well managed Archlinux repository rich with applications and overall, looks very attractive. Further, given it is based on Archlinux which has rolling release, I presume even Manjaro is a rolling release distro.

However, the developers could have provided taken some more care to provide a complete package like they are doing for the XFCE edition. Also, I would like to see some more applications like chat client, bit torrent client and Skype, like they have done in Manjaro XFCE. Even I would like to see LibreOffice Impress and developers please take a note of it.

The bottom line is that if you are looking for a very polished and refined KDE distro then you should try out Manjaro KDE 0.8.2! There are minor hiccups here and there but if you are able to resolve, the end result is quite a stable and elegant distro.

Read more!

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Snowlinux 3 White Review: As usual good, will be interesting to compare with Linux Mint 14

If you think Ubuntu 12.10 is buggy and painful to use, then you must try out the new Snowlinux 3 "White". It is based on Ubuntu 12.10 and it simplifies a lot of stuff which Ubuntu complicates! Desktops available along with this edition are: Mate 1.4, Cinnamon 1.6 and Gnome fallback 3.6. Linux kernel is 3.5.

From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon
Once the release note came in Distrowatch, I downloaded the 32-bit Mate and Cinnamon versions. Look wise it is typical Snowlinux, same set up and same wallpaper! Except for the menu, it is in fact difficult to distinguish between the mate and the cinnamon version! Cinnamon settings separate the Cinnamon one from the Mate.

From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon
From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon
I used two systems for the test here:

1. Asus K55V, Core i7 (3rd gen) 2.3 Ghz, 8 GB RAM, Nvidia 630M 2GB graphics
2. Asus K54C, Core i3 2.4 Ghz, 2GB RAM

Desktop looks as usual clean and professional. Aesthetics are really good and the distro looks polished. File Manager, Nemo 1.0.9, a fork of Nautilus, looks really good with dark and light color combinations. Functionalities provided are the same as Nautilus.
From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon

Touchpad was not recognized by default but a little bit  of tinkering with the mouse and touchpad settings made it work perfectly. Otherwise, it has all the good points that characterize an Ubuntu distro like sound, resolution, drivers were picked up perfectly.

From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon
Both Mate and Cinnamon worked real smooth on both the systems in live boot. I installed them to my Asus K54C which happens to be the laptop where I test the different distro releases.

Applications

I use Linux Mint for my regular needs. Honestly, it is difficult to distinguish between Linux Mint and Snowlinux for Mate and Cinnamon versions. Menu looks identical, color choice is similar. Somehow I am not very comfortable with the idea of two distros looking similar to each other!

Applications are judiciously put in both the versions - there is no shortage but overabundance has been cautiously avoided.
  • Graphics: Eye of Mate image viewer, Shotwell for photo management, LibreOffice Draw and Simple scan
  • Internet: Firefox 14, Thunderbird 14, Empathy for chat and Transmission to download torrents
  • Office: LibreOffice 3.6 suite, Document viewer to view pdf, cbr files, Dictionary
  • Multimedia: Gnome MPlayer, Rhythmbox for music, Brasero to copy and write CD/DVDs. 

Pluma is the default text editor. Audio/video codecs and Adobe flashplugin are not present by default. But, these are downloaded during installation.

Repository

Applications can be downloaded via Ubuntu Software Center and it has the richest collection of software in the Linux world! I downloaded, without any problem, a lot of applications from the repo.

From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon
CPU and RAM Usage

Before going on to the topic, amazingly the 32-bit version was able to recognize the 8 GB available RAM along with the 8 cores of the Core i7 processor! Why do I need a 64-bit edition in that case for Snowlinux?

From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon
From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon
Anyway, RAM usage is around 290 MB on live boot and post-installation it is around 240 MB. This is actually low and far lower than Ubuntu 12.10 on the same Asus K54C laptop. I got slightly higher CPU usage at 10-30%, and need to check which process is driving the higher CPU usage.

Installation

Just like any other Ubuntu distro, installation is plain and simple. Just answer ypur language, where you want to install, location, key board, create your login ID and password and you are done within 30 minutes if you are installing updates and third party software (like multimedia codecs, adobe flashplugin, etc.).

From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon
From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon
From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon
From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon
From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon
From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon
Overall

Both Mate and Cinnamon versions look pretty similar. But, I like the Mate version more. The Cinnamon version won't boot in my Asus K55V stating its inability to recognize the graphic driver. Also, I found it to be a tad bit slower than the Mate version.

Mate version is really smooth to use. The aesthetics are pleasant in both, semi-transparent menu and the polished interface, add glamor to the desktop. In overall, really good alternatives from Snowlinux for those who don't like Gnome 3 or Unity. And Snowlinux is far more resource efficient than a Ubuntu. Only one question, can the Mate/Cinnamon versions be made a little different in looks from Linux Mint? At present state, if I change the wallpaper, it is difficult to recognize it from Linux Mint. Possibly the developers can answer better. Anyway, Snowlinux update of Ubuntu 12.10 has come before Linux Mint, whose release candidate for 14 came yesterday. I am going to try those out as well and compare with Snowlinux.

You can check out the release notes and download information here.
23 Nov 2012: Please check out my review of Linux Mint 14 and comparison with Snowlinux. http://mylinuxexplore.blogspot.com/2012/11/linux-mint-14-nadia-review-is-it-better.html

Read more!

Thursday, November 8, 2012

Tiny Core Linux 4.7 Review: A base to build your own system!

First when I used Tiny Core Linux in 2009, I just started using Linux, and I was a bit disappointed with Tiny Core. Later when my experience and learning grew, I realized that I chose the wrong file to boot (Tiny Core and not Core Plus) and I completely underestimated an otherwise very efficient distro.

When the 4.7 release note came in Distrowatch a few days ago, I was prompt to download the Core Plus 67 MB ISO - really "tiny" if you compare it to any other distro! Now, given this is my first "real" experience with Tiny Core, there are chances of a lot of things being mentioned here, which may seem juvenile to experience Tiny Core users. But, I am taking my chances - can't stop myself from reviewing such an amazing distro.

What I did is initially do a live boot and then did a frugal installation on a 8 GB partition. In Core plus, essentially what you get is a shell on which you can build your own customized ultra-lightweight system with the preferred apps. Given this introduction, it is understandable that sufficient exposure and expertise is required to try out Tiny Core and explore its potential. Otherwise, you may end up disappointed like what happened to me in 2009 as I was limited that time by my own knowledge of Linux.


From Tiny Core Linux 4.7
In 4.7 version, Tiny Core comes with Linux kernel 3.0.21 which is same as the 4.6 version. The system used for the test is Asus K54C with Intel Core i3 processor (2.4 Ghz) and 2 GB RAM. Definitely not a resource constrained machine!

Core Plus provided me several desktop manager option at bootup like FLWM, Ice WM, Fluxbox, etc. I booted it up with default FLWM as I like it's minimalistic look with a docky below. It gives a no-nonsense and professional impression.

LAN was detected automatically, sound card worked, touch pad worked out of the box with both single/double tap, vertical scroll working, which is good. In Wifi mode, on clicking the wifi icon in the docky, it opened a terminal which scanned quickly the wifi networks around and asked me which one I would like to choose. After choosing the home network, I gave the password and the connection was instant! Pretty simple and efficient, I really like it!

There is no auto-mount and the user is required to mount the drives through control panel or mount icon in the docky to access the drive.

Applications
You won't get much default applications out-of-the-box with core plus but most of the relevant applications can be downloaded from repositories through "Apps" and/or "Scm Apps". I downloaded my favorite applications like
  • Browser: Firefox 16, Chromium 22.0.1229.79 for Tiny Core
  • Plugins: Adobe Flash 11, had a tough time in installing it
  • Music: Banshee
  • Video: VLC 2.0.1
  • Notes: Leafpad
  • Photos: Mtpaint
  • Chat: Pidgin
  • File Manager: Thunar and Nautilus
  • Office: Abiword, Gnumeric, pdf reader and writer, etc.
  • Conky to decorate the otherwise blank desktop!
From Tiny Core Linux 4.7
From Tiny Core Linux 4.7
From Tiny Core Linux 4.7
LibreOffice suite 3.5 and 3.6 are there in the repos along with a host of other applications like Clementine, Audacity, Audacious, Opera, Seamonkey, etc. The repository may not be rich like a Debian or a Ubuntu but enough applications are there to satisfy most common needs. I didn't install Skype, but there is a getskype.tcz in the repository to install Skype 2. Same holds for Nvidia drivers as well - it exists in the repository but I didn't require it.

Next was installation of the restricted codecs, ffmpeg, gstreamer, etc. and the application manager works well to resolve all the dependencies and satisfy all the preconditions before downloading an app. However, one thing I noted that there are quite a few antiquated apps like Firefox 10 which doesn't work even if you download and install. Experienced users would know a priori exactly what he is looking for, so no pain for them even if redundant apps are there in the repository. But, it may frustrate a bit the first time users.


From Tiny Core Linux 4.7
With regards to settings, Tiny Core offers an integrated view through control panel. I really like the option and I could set up most of the stuff from there without hitting the terminal.


From Tiny Core Linux 4.7
Installation
Installation is easier than I expected. You need to check whether you want to do a frugal installation in hard disk, or install in USB. Next thing for frugal is to decide on the partition where the OS is to be installed and whether to install boot loader. I made a frugal installation with whole disk option and boot loader to keep things simple. It would then ask for the formatting options with ext4 being the default. All it takes is about 5 minutes of time and you are done! Reboot and enjoy!


From Tiny Core Linux 4.7
From Tiny Core Linux 4.7
Post installation, I downloaded almost all the basic applications required for daily chores, as mentioned in the application section.Though the repository may not the richest around but offers most of the common applications.

Performance
The default desktop takes about 30-40 MB of RAM to get started with 0% CPU usage. With Firefox playing an Youtube video, Abiword, Gnomeric, Nautilus file manager and terminal open, the RAM consumption was 200 MB and CPU usage 28%! Undoubtedly even in low resource systems like a P3 or a P4, Tiny Core will offer blazing speed and ability to multi-task.


From Tiny Core Linux 4.7
Issue with Flash plugin
These days internet is synonymous with watching online videos and/or live streams. With getflash package, I had a bit of rough time. Initially when I clicked it, it showed that it had downloaded the program at /tce folder in root. However, when I started firefox, I wasn't able to play any flash video. I did it thrice but with no success.

I downloaded the flash plugin package for other linux from Adobe site itself and installed it via terminal. It worked for me. I could see the youtube videos but Firefox kept popping notifications to install additional missing plugins to play the media. Not sure where it goofed up!
From Tiny Core Linux 4.7


From Tiny Core Linux 4.7
Overall
Tiny core linux really impressed me with its speed, simplicity and power. If I compare it to Puppy Linux, Tiny Core seems a bit lighter and faster! Aesthetically too, it looks good with transparent docky and terminal.

Further, settings and usage is far too simple in Tiny Core (there is a tendency of lighter distros to be more complicated for users than the heavier counterparts). Most of the things like wifi, lan, sound, touchpad, etc. worked like a charm for me. Accepted, I didn't try out a lot of things there but whatever I tried out worked!

Definitely I recommend Tiny Core linux as a live-usb as well as to those who are in search of super light-weight professional looking operating system. Given it supports touchpad, nvidia drivers, webcam, etc., I can safely recommend it for both new as well as old systems. I bet once you start using Tiny Core, you'll start loving this highly functional distro.

Read more!