Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Review. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Trisquel 6.0 Review: High performing and extremely elegant! Free Software advocate or not - a definitely recommended distro for all Linux lovers!

The birth of Ubuntu is possibly, pivotal to the Linux history. Reason? Without Ubuntu, possibly we won't have heard the names of 50% distros in the Distrowatch top 100 list! You will find all kinds of Ubuntu derived distros there - mostly spiced up Ubuntu which work right out of the box with all free and non-free multimedia codecs and restricted softwares loaded in them! However, last week I came across a different kind of Ubuntu derivative which strictly uses free softwares only, as defined by the Free Software Foundation guidelines! Originally Trisquel is a Spanish distro (with English language option thankfully - otherwise the world would have missed a really wonderful distro!).

From Trisquel 6.0 http://mylinuxexplore.blogspot.in


On free software part, possibly, I am not so emotionally attached as the developers or free software advocates. So, my review is completely focused on functionality and performance of Trisquel without getting really involved on the free-software bit. I definitely support their cause but in this review I treated Trisquel just like any other Linux distro.


Read more!

Saturday, January 19, 2013

Ultimate Edition 3.5 Review: Ugly but fully loaded!

My first exposure to Ultimate edition was with 3.4. I installed the 64-bit one to my newly bought Core i7 3rd gen. laptop with 8 GB RAM last year, but had to remove it bugged by it's instability. First the default interface is devoid of much aesthetics, Second, effects are too loud and most important, third, instability - not a single day passed with something or the other crashing in the background or my laptop suddenly stopped responding and would require a hard reset. First two issues on aesthetics and too much of effects I took care myself with 24 hours of usage but I couldn't handle the third one and replaced it with supremely stable Linux Mint 13 Cinnamon.

From Ultimate Edition 3.5

It may sound a sad tone to begin with - but, the disappointment is primarily due to my high expectation build around the distro and hope that it would really work for me. Tell me, where you get Gnome 3, Unity, Gnome 2, etc. desktop environments together in a single distro? Everyday you can use a different desktop! Plus, it is loaded with applications - it has almost the entire Ubuntu repository loaded there! 

From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5

With the new release note of Ultimate Edition 3.5 coming out on 3rd Jan, and that too in KDE flavor, I was really intrigued to check it out, with the expectation of more stability in the distro. UE 3.5 is about 3.5 GB, which is about 300 MB more than UE 3.4. Both are built on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS. However, the upgraded version has quite a lot of added flavors like KDE 4.8, XFCE 4.8, LXDE, OpenBox, Cinnamon, in addition to Gnome 3, Unity and Gnome 2. Linux kernel is 3.2.0 as in Ubuntu 12.04.1. I downloaded the 32-bit version this time.

Testing was done for a week on my Asus K54C 2.2 Ghz Core i3 laptop with 2 GB RAM, decent specs to run any OS. I did a live boot from USB and then installed it on the same machine to use it for a week and make a fair assessment. At boot up itself, one can sense little attention to art-work, as UE 3.5 KDE started with a Lubuntu screen and an Ubuntu login window! Further, because of the GUI's dark theme along with dark fonts, visibility becomes a bit of issue in UE 3.5.


Applications
It will take me at least 2-3 posts to accurately provide you the applications in UE 3.5. Better you check a few screenshots to build an expectation. The screenshots are taken in UE with LXDE desktop, as in the default KDE menu, it is difficult to show majority of the apps. In nutshell, entire Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu and Lubuntu - entire Ubuntu clan is present in UE 3.5 along with the Ubuntu repository. Actually there is no need to add any software center as there won't be any app left in repo! Multimedia codecs are pre-loaded and one can straight away listen to favorite music or watch movies immediately after installation or live boot.

From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
Amazingly, you see Muon and Lubuntu software centers as well along with the default Ubuntu software center! Also, think of multiple file managers! Kind of over-abundance but I can live with it!

From Ultimate Edition 3.5

My only grudge here is LibreOffice is still 3.5, GIMP is 2.6 and quite a few of the other apps are also backdated. However, users can add the appropriate packages from Quantal/Nadia and upgrade the software.

Installation
Installation is typical Ubuntu and takes about 30 minutes. Steps are pretty simple and would not surprise even a newbie. Even here the installation steps have real font color problem and whatever is written, is barely visible due to white font and semi-transparent GUI. Seriously, the developers should take some help from an expert on art-work!

From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
From Ultimate Edition 3.5
 
Performance
I downloaded the 32-bit OS for the test. Performance was assessed post installation and I tried all the available desktop options. Of these, Cinnamon 2D, Openbox and XDMC options didn't work for me. From the rest, LXDE was the least resource consuming option for me, followed by XFCE and Gnome classic mode. Surprisingly, KDE came out to be the most inefficient option!

Desktops CPU RAM
Cinnamon 1-10% 360 MB
Cinnamon 2D - -
Gnome 1-10% 285 MB
Gnome Classic 1-10% 286 MB
Gnome Classic (No effects) 1-10% 281 MB
Gnome/Openbox 1-10% 440 MB
KDE Plasma Workspace 1-10% 782 MB
KDE/Openbox 1-10% 774 MB
Lubuntu 1-10% 167 MB
Lubuntu netbook 1-10% 169 MB
Openbox - -
Ubuntu 1-10% 438 MB
Ubuntu 2D 1-10% 438 MB
XBMC - -
Xfce Session 1-10% 182 MB
Xubuntu Session 1-10% 182 MB
Ubuntu Studio 1-10% 185 MB

If the compare UE 3.5 desktop environments to the corresponding releases (from Ubuntu 12.04.1 and Linux Mint 13 stables), Ultimate's performances didn't deviate significantly from the parent distros (except for KDE). All the results are from installations on the same machine (which I tested at different point in time in 2012).


Competing Distro RAM CPU
Linux Mint 13 Cinnamon 6-10% 200 MB
Linux Mint 13 Mate 2-3% 207 MB
Kubuntu 12.04.1 2-10% 310 MB
Lubuntu 12.04 0-5% 119 MB
Ubuntu 12.04.1 5-20% 280 MB
Xubuntu 12.04.1 1-5% 160 MB

Stability
In my 10 days of usage, I found this edition of UE to be relatively more stable than the previous versions I had tested. Post initial update, I didn't have any background application crash. Except KDE, rest of the desktop environments were quite smooth to use. Specially I liked the Lubuntu version. Imagine the efficiency of LXDE with a whole lot of applications from Ubuntu/Kubuntu/Xubuntu! Cool!

Overall
Using UE 3.5, as it is, is no fun at all because of shoddy artwork and really bad looking interface. I couldn't believe KDE can look so bad till I used UE 3.5. Anyway, users can improve the artwork. I don't mind the artwork when I see what I am getting in return - a whole lot of applications to work with and possibly never requiring to open the Ubuntu Software Center! Paradoxically, UE has 3 Software Centers to offer!

From version 3.4 to 3.5, there are quite a few plus points - the developers have toned down the effects quite a bit and now it doesn't hamper with productivity. All kinds of applications are out of the box and gives you a complete experience. I agree the distro is a bit inefficient compared to a single desktop distro like a Lubuntu or Xubuntu, but anyway, UE is not supposed to be installed to a low end machine! It is and absolutely is, recommended if you have a real good system (with dual core or high end processor and minimum 2 GB RAM) in your possession. Otherwise, don't even think of trying UE - it's not for the faint hearted.

Plus, I'll recommend UE 3.5 to Linux users with some experience. For newbies, it might be a little confusing to have so many desktops, file managers, system monitors, mail clients, browsers, and a whole lot of other apps for the same function.

So, if you are looking for a new experience, different desktop every day or a whole lot of applications to play with and can live with bad art-work, UE 3.5 is a must try. You may like it! You can download UE 3.5 32-bit and 64-bit editions from here.

Read more!

Thursday, November 22, 2012

Linux Mint 14 Nadia Review: Is it better than Maya?

Big news this week in the Linux world - the reigning king of Linux "Linux Mint" has come out with the Mate and Cinnamon desktop version of Ubuntu 12.10. The codename is Nadia. Now, before jumping onto the actual review, a bit of introspection. One question that always comes to my mind - I have reviewed so many wonderful Linux distros and quite a few are really really outstanding. Still what works for Linux Mint release after release? Why people in the Linux world uses it more than any other Linux distro, even Fedora and Ubuntu? Why I too use Linux Mint as my primary distro (except one machine, P4 old computer, where I use Puppy Precise)?
 Linux Mint 14 Cinnamon
From Linux Mint 14
From Linux Mint 14

Linux Mint 14 Mate
From Linux Mint 14
From Linux Mint 14
Is it because it is easier for a Windows user to adapt to Linux Mint? I doubt, because my Linux Mint desktops look nowhere close to Windows! Is it because everything works out of the box and even if you aren't able to run a single code in terminal or fix a single thing in Linux, Mint still works? Possibly yes! I haven't seen a distro in my life which is so trouble free and stable (this includes Windows as well which in my opinion is trouble only!).

With this background, now lets directly jump onto the review. It has three purposes - one, to assess the new release in general. Two, compare it to the previous release (Mint Maya 13, which is also an LTS with 5 years of support). And finally, compare it to the recently released Snowlinux 3 Mate / Cinnamon which deeply impressed me.

Assessment of Mint Nadia
I had already downloaded the RC2 versions of both Cinnamon and Mate. The release note came sometime in 11 Nov with the final release on 20 Nov. So, without rushing for the new release I just installed them one by one and updated post installation. For both I had to download about 200 MB of updates and my installations were the final releases. Both are 32-bit ISOs about less than 1 GB in size.

Installations were done in a Asus K54C, 2.4 Ghz Core i3 processor with 2 GB RAM. The same laptop was used for testing out the Mint Maya as well. Both have Linux kernel 3.5 and Cinnamon has 1.6 (the latest) with Mate having 1.4 (also the latest) desktop.

What is new?
Lets begin with the Mate version. The information provided here are from the release notes combined with snapshots from my testing. Mate 1.4 supports bluetooth now as well as Caja supports dropbox. MATE now includes its own character map, fast alt-tabbing with Marco compositing, a selection of notification styles (although this was included in Linux Mint 13, it wasn't part of MATE 1.2), and Caja improvements such as a toggle button to show and edit the path and a new button to compare files in the file conflict dialog.
From Linux Mint 14
From Linux Mint 14

Cinnamon 1.6, on the other hand, comes with a lot of features and attractiveness. Cinnamon, I guess, is developing at a faster rate than Mate. The major new additions for Cinnamon 1.6 include:

1. Give names to workspaces: like naming different workspaces for movies, document work, internet browsing, etc. These will remain even after you relogin. I am not sure it will be any utility to me at this point but might be handy if I am working with 10-15 workspaces to recall where I was doing what! Additionally, once you switch workspaces, the names will be visible in bold.

From Linux Mint 14
2. Windows Quick list: Alongside workspaces, there is a windows quick list applet as well on the right hand corner of the panel, for easy access and to keep track of the applications that the user has opened.

3. Similar to Mate 1.4, there is a notification applet as well in Cinnamon 1.6.

From Linux Mint 14
Cinnamon 1.6 has 800 incremental innovations including Nemo. You can check out all of them at the Linux Mint notes.

Additional improvement I saw is in the artwork. Linux Mint 14 has some really nice looking new wallpapers.
  
From Linux Mint 14

Applications
Application list is more or less the same as in previous version - only difference being the latest release has the most updated applications. A summary of the applications present is given below for the benefit of the new users who want to try out Linux Mint.
  • Internet: Firefox 16, Thunderbird 16, Pidgin Internet Messenger, Transmission bit-torrent client, XChat IRC
  • Graphics: GIMP 2.8, document viewer 1.4.0, Eye of Mate viewer, Gthumb 3.0.2 image viewer, simple scan
  • Multimedia: Banshree music player, Brasero CD/DVD writer, Gnome MPlayer, Movie Player, VLC 2.0.4
  • Office: LibreOffice 3.6.2.2 writer, calc, impress, base, draw - basically Microsoft Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Access and Paint equivalent
Apart from these, Linux Mint is feature rich with Archive manager, Pluma (gedit fork), gdebi package manager to install applications in Debian package format. Caja 1.4.0 is the file manager in Mate and Nemo 1.1.2 in Cinnamon, both are forked from Nautilus. 

The base repository is the same as Ubuntu 12.10 and it is perhaps the richest Linux repository around. The GUI is a bit different from Ubuntu - MinInstall 7.4.4. It is simple and works well to search and install applications from the respository.

Comparison with Linux Mint Maya

Parameters Mint 14 Cinnamon Mint 13 Cinnamon Mint 14 Mate Mint 13 Mate
Size of ISO 922 MB 857 MB 1 GB 942 MB
Booting time (post installation) 20 sec 15 sec 10 sec 10 sec
Desktop Cinnamon 1.6.7 Cinnamon 1.4 Mate 1.4 Mate 1.2
Linux kernel 3.5.0-17 3.2.0-23 3.5.0-17 3.2.0-23
CPU Usage (post installation) 1-5% 1-5% 2-3% 2-3%
RAM usage (post installation) 221 MB 200 MB 199 MB 207 MB
Installation time (with 1 MBPS connection) 30 Min 30 Min 30 Min 30 Min
Wifi detection Immediate Immediate Immediate Immediate
Touchpad detection Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic
Ease of use Really smooth to use Really smooth to use Really smooth to use Really smooth to use
Eye candy factor Looks the best with a very elegant file manager and with application colors matching the ash-black colored theme Looks good with application colors matching the ash colored theme Looks good with application colors matching the ash colored theme Looks good with application colors matching the ash colored theme
Repository MintInstall 7.4.4 MintInstall 7.3.9 MintInstall 7.4.4 MintInstall 7.3.9
File Manager Nemo 1.1.2 Nautilus 3.4.1 Caja 1.4.0 Caja 1.2.1

Linux Mint generally boots up a tad bit slower than Ubuntu distros. Based on performance in terms of resource usage, clearly the Nadia Mate 1.4 is marginally ahead. I noted really good performance from Mate 1.4, almost comparable to an XFCE desktop! At steady state with only system monitor running, the RAM consumption was around 200 MB and 2-3% CPU usage. If you talk of multi-tasking, with Firefox 16 playing youtube, Writer and Calc running, it consumes only 357 MB RAM with only 40% CPU usage. Mint Maya Mate 1.2, too, gives almost comparable performance on the same machine. It is difficult to choose between the two and given Mint Maya Mate has 5 years of support, I guess it would be better to stick to Linux Mint 13 and wait for another LTS to come in 2014.

From Linux Mint 14

However, for Linux Mint Cinnamon, the CPU usage shows a bit higher, it might be because of some driver problem that I need to rectify on my system. Else, Linux Mint 14 Cinnamon looks shinier and more attractive. Special mention should be made of Nemo 1.1.2, it looks very refined in Nadia, I must say. Overall, even Cinnamon is quite speedy on my system and I could multi-task easily under similar conditions as above by spending only 470 MB RAM and 70-75% CPU usage. Nautilus in the Mint Maya Cinnamon looks quite blander compared to Nemo in Mint Nadia. But, Mint Maya has 5 years of support behind it.

From Linux Mint 14

Comparison with Snowlinux 3 Cinnamon/Mate
I reviewed Snowlinux 3 release a week ago and it also came out with Cinnamon 1.6 and Mate 1.4 versions, as well as almost identical look to Linux Mint. Even there I got a bit of higher CPU usage in Cinnamon but very good performance in Mate. Performance wise, I would rate the Snowlinux 3 series at par with Linux Mint 14. Actually, it is a tough choice as both of them look, feel and behave identically. However, number of out-of-the-box applications are more in Linux Mint and it has a better online forum.

From Snowlinux 3 Mate Cinnamon

Overall 
Linux Mint 14 is indeed a very good release. I found Ubuntu 12.10 to be a bit unstable and but Mint 14 is really stable. I have been using it from the RC days and it has worked smoothly for me till date. However, some of the goodies in Ubuntu 12.10 are not here like Web apps, Ubuntu music store, Amazon integration (some hate it though!), better integration with social network, etc. But, Linux Mint has rock solid stability. 

Personally, I don't get tired of installing Linux distros as it is my hobby and I install 2-3 new distros to my systems every week and uninstall the older ones. But, my main production laptop has Linux Mint Maya Cinnamon 64-bit and I don't like to tamper with my preferred settings in there. Am I going to re-install Mint Nadia to it? Possibly no - for now I'll stick to Mint Maya and add Mint Nadia ppa's and download Nemo file manager. Here's how you can backport Nadia ppa's.

25Nov2012: Actually backporting Nadia ppa's and then changing Nemo 1.1.2 to default file manager has improved performance of Linux Mint 13 significantly. Nemo is a lot lighter and faster file manager, undoubtedly. Definite recommendation from my side to backport Nadia ppa's.

To backport, open Menu ->Preferences -> Software Sources -> Click on "Backported Packages (Backports)" checkbox. Close it and then launch update manager either from menu or from the update notifier on the right hand side of the panel. Refresh and update all Level 1 and Level 2 updates. Restart and you are done!

To set Nemo as the default file manager, go to Menu -> Accessories -> Files (one would be Nautilus and another would be Nemo). Open Nemo and on right hand top corner you'll see an option to make Nemo the default file manager. Click it and you are done. 

Download
Linux Mint 14 is available in both 32 and 64-bit versionsYou can download via torrent, direct download option available as well. Please check the release note for downloading.

Read more!

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Manjaro 0.8.2 XFCE: Light, fast and works well, new Package manager aside

The flagship distro from the Manjaro stable is perhaps the XFCE version. I was deeply impressed by the refinement and functionalities offered by KDE version. The XFCE version, too, lived up to the standards set in 0.8.1 release. I tested it out on my Asus K54C, 2.4 Ghz Core i3 processor with 2 GB RAM. First I did a live boot followed by installation on an 8 GB partition specially created for Linux distro testing.

From Manjaro 0.8.2 XFCE

XFCE 4.10 is the desktop environment with Linux kernel 3.4.18 in this edition. The desktop looks really bright and has a really good looking conky! New wallpaper is also better than the previous default wallpaper. The 32-bit ISO is 1.2 GB and lower in size than the 0.8.1 release (1.5 GB). I thought the developers would have packed all the goodness of 0.8.1 release in a smaller package - however, when I booted it up I saw a trimmed version of the former release. A lot of applications like, Openshot video editor, complete LibreOffice suite, PlayonLinux, etc. are not in the updated edition. A letdown after the 0.8.1 release for sure. A list of major applications available in 0.8.2 is given below:
  • Graphics: GIMP 2.8, Viewnior, Simple Scan
  • Internet: Firefox 16.0.2, Pidgin chat client, Skype 4, Thunderbird 16, XChat, Remote Dekstop
  • Multimedia: SMPlayer, DeaDBeef, Xfburn among others
  • Office: LibreOffice Calc, LibreOffice Writer, epdf viewer, Orage calendar, etc.

You can read my review of the 0.8.1 XFCE release here. The updated 0.8.2, too, works out of the box like the former release and is pretty easy to install on the hard disc.

On package management and installation of applications, I liked the 0.8.1 release more than the present release. Earlier release had a simple pacman gui where applications are grouped into different classes on the left hand panel. You can either search or directly go to the category and browse for the package you would like to install. However, present release complicates things by giving a package browser (where you can browse packages, check dependencies, etc. but unfortunately can't install!) and a pacman-gui (where you write the package name noted from the package browser and it will open a terminal to install). This is a bit funny and unnecessarily complicated when things can be a lot simpler.

From Manjaro 0.8.2 XFCE
From Manjaro 0.8.2 XFCE
I would like the previous pacman package interface back and the new interface doesn't appeal to me at all! However, installing packages like Openshot video editor, PlayonLinux, Docky, etc. wasn't a big deal even on the new release. Only thing, I had to do back and forth a few times to install them. With a couple of panels I created a Gnome 2 look from XFCE.

From Manjaro 0.8.2 XFCE
Rest is pretty much the same. On my system after installation, the default desktop would consume about 1-5% CPU and 160-200 MB RAM, like the previous edition. The distro is smooth to use and offer good multi-tasking ability even within limited resources.

From Manjaro 0.8.2 XFCE
Overall
In overall, I would stick to the earlier release (0.8.1), which I thought as one of the best XFCE releases of the year. Given Archlinux has a rolling release, it is just a matter of updating the old version. As you can see in the screenshot below, it is just a matter of downloading around 500 MB of updates to make it the latest version. I didn't download the new package manager but rather stick to the tried and tested old one.

From Manjaro 0.8.2 XFCE
Package manager issue aside, the distro is really good and if you are looking for a rolling release slick XFCE distro, then you should try Manjaro XFCE!

Read more!

Saturday, November 17, 2012

Manjaro Linux 0.8.2 KDE Review: Is it the best KDE release this year?

Right from the first release itself, Manjaro Linux really impressed me. I tried their KDE release earlier, in 0.8 and 0.8.1 but was not as impressed as the XFCE version. But, the 0.8.2 release changed my opinion. It is one of the most refined and polished KDE releases that I have used this year.

From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
The release note of Manjaro 0.8.2 came on 10th Nov'12 in Distrowatch and the release is in three flavors: Gnome, KDE and XFCE. I guess the XFCE release is the most popular from Manjaro stable but I started of with the KDE release. Of late, KDE is catching my attention most and I must admit, I have started liking the KDE 4.9.2. Most of the earlier bugs are fixed and it works well.

From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
The 32 bit KDE version of Manjaro is about 1.6 GB in size and quite bulky in terms of Linux standards. Manjaro KDE is 4.9.2 and Linux kernel is 3.4.18. Manjaro is built on Archlinux.

I tried it out on my Asus K54C, Core i3, 2,4 Ghz and 2 GB RAM. Live boot was followed by installation on a 8 GB partition. Screen resolution was correctly identified by Manjaro, Wifi was recognized easily, sound didn't work initially but once I checked out the sound settings I could make it work by simple trial and error. However, I am not sure why the Manjaro wallpaper is not in KDE though it is present in Gnome and XFCE releases! The KDE default wallpaper looks really bland.

One thing I must say, I have used a few KDE distros like PCLinuxOS, OpenSUSE 12.2, Kubuntu, Linux Mint KDE, etc. but nowhere KDE felt so smooth to use like in Manjaro Linux. May be my perception but we'll come to know once I compare Manjaro Linux with the other notable KDE 4.9.2 release, Kubuntu 12.10.

Applications
Somehow, I have a mixed feeling on the application list. It has some really good applications but some notable apps are missing as well. A list is given below:
  • Internet:Firefox 16, Thunderbird 16
  • Graphics: GIMP 2.8, Photo Manager, Photo Viewer, screen capture, okular document viewer for pdf, cbr, etc., and scanner
  • Multimedia: Amarok music player, Dragon video player, sound mixer and multimedia CD/DVD burner
  • Office: LibreOffice 3.6 Calc and Write

From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
In addition multimedia codecs are in-built as well as Adobe Flashplugin 11 works out-of-the-box. Hence, straight away you can live boot this distro and start playing your favorite movie or music. Further, there are apps for coding and development as well as desktop globe.
From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2

From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
Coming on to the notable misses -
  1. Why no LibreOffice Impress? Professionals like me require Impress along Calc and Write. Should have been provided by default.
  2. No chat client like empathy, pidgin, Skype, etc.
  3. No torrent downloader
Anyway, no major problem therein - all of them can be downloaded from the archlinux repos. Settings are integrated like any other KDE distro which is actually helpful for the new users.

Installation
Manjaro has a very easy installation process, comparable to the likes of Ubuntu or Linux Mint. There is an installation guide as well which illustrates each and every step with suitable diagrams, though the diagrams are from 0.8.1 installation, I guess.
From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
Installations steps are as usual, choose the installation drive, format it, install, create user id and grub2 menu. All inclusive, Manjaro takes about 15-20 minutes to install which is pretty quick.

Repository
Manjaro has a package browser to search and a new pcman-gui to install packages. However, only the package browser is present in the default ISO and I guess users are supposed to download packages through terminal - or am I missing somethings here? Because unlike XFCE version, the pacman-gui is not present in the KDE version.

Anyway, I downloaded it through terminal as root (#su followed by #pacman -S pacman-gui). With Pacman-gui, I checked by installing a couple of applications (VLC and Skype), it resolves all dependencies while downloading and shows it in the tree section. Individual package browser and pacman package manager is fairly simple to operate and works well. However, I don't understand the meaning of keeping two separate applications. Can't it be as simple as Ubuntu software center? There you have only one window for both. Actually I liked the earlier pacman interface where both browsing and downloading could be done together, more than the present one.

From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
Performance
I really liked the smoothness of Manjaro 0.8.2 KDE. If I compare it with the recently released Kubuntu 12.10, RAM usage in Manjaro KDE is about 440 MB compared to 300 MB in Kubuntu, under similar conditions and on the same machine. CPU usages are identical, about 5-7%. Both are 32-bit distros.

From Manjaro KDE 0.8.2
However, I found Manjaro more smooth to use than Kubuntu. In my system RAM wasn't a constraint and I could multi-task with several applications like LibreOffice Calc, Firefox, konsole, and package manager downloading applications with ease.

Overall
In overall, to me, this could have been the KDE distro of the year barring the pacman issue! KDE never felt so good to use. Things mostly work out of the box, Manjaro KDE is loaded with applications, is stable, has a well managed Archlinux repository rich with applications and overall, looks very attractive. Further, given it is based on Archlinux which has rolling release, I presume even Manjaro is a rolling release distro.

However, the developers could have provided taken some more care to provide a complete package like they are doing for the XFCE edition. Also, I would like to see some more applications like chat client, bit torrent client and Skype, like they have done in Manjaro XFCE. Even I would like to see LibreOffice Impress and developers please take a note of it.

The bottom line is that if you are looking for a very polished and refined KDE distro then you should try out Manjaro KDE 0.8.2! There are minor hiccups here and there but if you are able to resolve, the end result is quite a stable and elegant distro.

Read more!